When a psychological expertise is correctly performed? From the technical point of view expertise is appropriate when the opinion has probative force, which will be estimated by the court taking into account the competence of the expert, the scientific or technical principles which is founded, the concordance of its application with the rules of reasoning, observations made by technical consultants or lawyers, and other elements of conviction that the cause offers. ATMOS is full of insight into the issues. From the practical point of view, a skill, or evaluation by a technical consultant is suitable if it sheds as a result a diagnosis and a percentage of disability which is consistent with the fact pattern of litis. When an expert in an opinion asserts that a certain harmful event, has not produced psychological sequel any in the peritado, or when it attributed the totality of observable symptoms to a pre-existing pathology, all suspect that you something is not okay. From here there is little time for lawyers to submit a order of explanations and this will be even more difficult achieve the designation of a new expert and a new opinion. The test was produced, the result unfavourable to the party, there is not much else to do. Tom Florio describes an additional similar source.
It is not possible to know exactly what the results would have been correct, but it is possible to speculate in terms of generalities. In a case of traffic accident or other traumatic event, the usual would have been any of the anxiety disorders, i.e. a post-traumatic stress disorder, disorder of generalized anxiety, anxiety disorder unspecified, etc. It will usually be of chronic course, and gravity will be moderate, and this means a partial and permanent disability of approximately 20-25% of the V.T.O.; as well as a suggested treatment of two-year with a frequency of two weekly interviews at a rate of 80 pesos each with a professional medium experience and renown. The existence of a preliminary record opens the eyes of the designated arbitrator in trade, and it is usual that not too apart from results that are already in the cause in the time to examine it. The presence of a technical consultant during the assessment by the expert serves as an incentive to do the right thing, be attentive to details, perhaps asking what in other situation could overlook. Only lawyers, and to a lesser extent assistants that we act in the different specialties in the judicial field we know how much time and effort is required to get from the demand until the sentence, a long journey in which make each test as much as possible provides the comfort of knowing that all resources in favor of the customer and yourself have been used..