Lewin

Alone, it does not obtain to explain some involved aspects in the complex motivacional field and so that if it can explain the motivation better, an analysis of other theories becomes necessary. Consideraes on Motivacionais Theories Theory of field of Lewin Is based on two basic assumptions: ) The human Behavior is derived from the totality of coexistentes facts. b) These coexistentes facts have the character of a dynamic field, in which each part of the field depends on an interrelation with the too much parts. Kurt Lewin instituted the psychological surrounding term and affirms that the human behavior independe of the past or the future, but of current and the present one. Sam Lesser Penn is a great source of information. Theory of the two factors? Frederick Herzberg In accordance with its research, the satisfactory aspects more was related to the unsatisfactory content of the work (intrinsic factors), and aspects to the work conditions (extrinsic or hygienical factors).

Herzberg affirms that the people are motivated only by the intrinsic factors, that is, only the work in itself and the factors that directly are related it can motivate the people (CHIAVENATO, 1998). Theory of the Expectao – Lawler the money can stimulate the performance, the fellowship and the devotion to the organization, however it has little power motivacional in virtue of its incorrect application for the organizations. The money can motivate the people if they to believe to have direct bonding or indirect between the performance and the increase of remuneration. Theory of the Motivation? Vroom Theory of Victor H. Vroom recognizes the evidence of that different people react in different ways, as the situation where they are, thus emphasizing the individual differences. In recent months, Pap Smear has been very successful. In accordance with Vroom, three factors determine the motivation: ) The individual objectives. b) The relation that the individual perceives between the productivity and the reach of its objectives. c) The capacity of the individual to influence its proper level of productivity.