I begin it Sarlo in accordance with (2007), history gained in this trajectory romantescos contours, to the few was gaining the space academic what he propitiated a metodolgico reordenamento. Verbal history if became object of conservation of the souvenir and repairing of the identity. To put the conflicts between history and memory if has evidenced from now on, if establishing from that the official narrative is not complemented with the orality. Distanciamento would not have to exist enters the words in guideline, however to the times it is had sensation that are in contrary ways. For History factual-officer delineated for the elite (winning) it does not believe verbal history, verbalizada by means of an anonymous person. Therefore generally of that social classroom history omits of its writings.
The story of the anonymous ones, the daily one of those () that it is not mentioned in didactic books. We think that the distrust of history in giving credibility to the memory and for the fact of this information to be deriving orality, and in turn the memory distrusts of history in virtue of the sectismo in giving the real value to the feelings of the souvenir of significant form. It fits to mention that this two sources in the truth is one only, therefore the objective biggest and to give to vision those truths that were asleep and are despertadas by the rescue of the memory. Great part of the works in communities quilombolas, to guarantee the right to the land to the descendants of these nuclei of resistance, if of the one for the way of interviews. With intention to rescue the history of that segment of the population, that will be able to lose itself in the time in case that the vivamento of the memory is not carried through. An example that if incases in this question, is on the war of Troy.